In the episode, the Simpsons win the Americas fattest family and their price is having a free holiday to Afghanistan. Homer and Bart go to the gun shop to see what they can play with. Bart buys his first gun because the age limit is 6. Lisa goes to the book store to find her favorite novel, Enders Game except the Afghans have changed it to fit their culture. The book is about the boy going to space to learn how to become the best bomber possible and fights through simulations to learn properly. He bombs the Americans and becomes the most well known bomber in Afghanistan. Next scene you see the boy in heaven waiting for his 72 virgins and he gets 72 old men with his god saying to him, "i never said they were young women"
This episode highlights the immoral culture of the Afghans and makes fun of them. It also highlights the satire that Americans are fat.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Monday, November 14, 2011
Satirical Cartoons
| Text Number | Why it made me laugh | Techniques Utilised |
| 7 | Politically incorrect and harsh. Ironic about the political views | Incongruity |
| 10 | It doesn't have any meaning and is useless. Making fun of the use of report cards when it doesn't matter. Highlights the ridiculousness. | Incongruity Exaggeration |
| 2 | They exaggerate Julia's nose saying its bigger than it actually is. It also shows the nose not fitting on someones page. | Exaggeration |
| 19 | It emphasizes gender roles and how certain genders cant do certain things. It shows the guy wanting to have a bag full of his toys but the girl says hes not allowed to because its a purse. | Reversal |
Monday, October 24, 2011
Why does it matter: Learning English - Tom Cho
Learning English
Tom Cho
Learning English is a typical display of an Asian that doesn't know how to speak English. The author says that they didn't fully learn how to speak English until about 20 years of being in Australia. The author also uses phrases like 'yada yada yada" and "whatever". Tom didn't understand English and learned from TV and celebrities.
The author celebrated their 20 year stay in Australia by adopting an Anglican name (an Australian English name). His use of celebrities to choose his name was influenced by learning the language from TV and celebrities. He chose a name from Fantasy Island, Ricardo Montalban.
Learning English is an interesting story because it shows us how he learned English and his influences from learning it that way.
Tom Cho
Learning English is a typical display of an Asian that doesn't know how to speak English. The author says that they didn't fully learn how to speak English until about 20 years of being in Australia. The author also uses phrases like 'yada yada yada" and "whatever". Tom didn't understand English and learned from TV and celebrities.
The author celebrated their 20 year stay in Australia by adopting an Anglican name (an Australian English name). His use of celebrities to choose his name was influenced by learning the language from TV and celebrities. He chose a name from Fantasy Island, Ricardo Montalban.
Learning English is an interesting story because it shows us how he learned English and his influences from learning it that way.
My First Kiss by Lian Low
1. How does the author describe Malaysia in regards to showing affection?
The author describes Malaysia in regards to showing affection as bare and almost non-existent.
The author describes Malaysia in regards to showing affection as bare and almost non-existent.
2. What happens to the author when she hits puberty?
When the author hits puberty, she starts looking and guys differently and tries to orchestrate a kiss in her play.
When the author hits puberty, she starts looking and guys differently and tries to orchestrate a kiss in her play.
3. What is the author’s experience at school when she first arrives to Melbourne?
She's sort of made into an outsider and only knows the people in her ESL class.
She's sort of made into an outsider and only knows the people in her ESL class.
4. What is it that made the author feel that she wasn’t Australian even though she spoke English fluently?
Her Asian accent when she spoke and because she doesn't use slang.
Her Asian accent when she spoke and because she doesn't use slang.
5. What else was it about the author that further alienated her from her peers?
She doesn't know anyone except the other Asians.
She doesn't know anyone except the other Asians.
6. What does the use of description like ‘crash hot’ do to the audience’s perception of the author?
It shows she's trying to speak with more slang and not always speak proper.
It shows she's trying to speak with more slang and not always speak proper.
7. What opportunity does university give the author? What is it about university which would allow her to express herself more freely?
University gives the author an opportunity to direct and write plays. She expresses her feelings more freely because she can do this.
University gives the author an opportunity to direct and write plays. She expresses her feelings more freely because she can do this.
8. What role does creativity play for the author? Why do you think that creativity would be so important to her?
Creativity plays a big role for the author because it allows the author to express herself more freely. I think creativity is important to her because it would bring her closer to others.
Creativity plays a big role for the author because it allows the author to express herself more freely. I think creativity is important to her because it would bring her closer to others.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Teenage Dreamers by Phillip Tang
1. What are the first two sentences of the story and how do they create a tension in the story?
The first two sentences are "My father had a sixth sense. He could tell when people were going to die." These first two sentences create tension by setting the serious and depressing mood of the story. They create the vibe that this story will not be a pleasant one.
2. What has happened to the author’s father as a result of his wife’s death?
He grew an obsession with Leslie.
3. How does the description of the father removing his hands from his face as ‘unmasked’ related to the seriousness of his following statement?
He took his hands away from his face and unmasked himself to show the seriousness and the reality of the statement. He unmasked the truth.
4. Consider how the father lives his life and conducts himself and the other people in the theatre for the film the author and his father are watching. How does this relate to the title of the story?
The way the authors father lives his life and conducts himself with Leslie more than the others in the theater shows that he is having a teenage dream and is acting like a teenager, that's how it relates to the title of the story, the authors father is having a dream most teenagers have.
Monday, October 17, 2011
Conversations with my Parents by Oanh Thi Tran
1. What is ironic about the way the author and the father become close? What has to happen to the father?
What's ironic about how the author and the father become close is that the father is very sick and will probably pass away soon, just as they're getting close.
What's ironic about how the author and the father become close is that the father is very sick and will probably pass away soon, just as they're getting close.
2. How would you characterise the conversation that the author has with her parents?
Short and awkward.
3. What is it that worries the author most about these conversations?
The author worries that we will grow distant from his parents and the convo's will become even slower.
4. There is a gap between the author’s need to express feelings common in western countries and her family’s lack of desire to express their feelings verbally. How does the family still express their feelings for their child, just not verbally?
The family still expresses their feelings by always wanting to talk to their child and caring about what he's saying.
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Lessons from my School Years by Ray Wing-Lun
1. There is a stark contrast created in the opening of this story between what the narrator had been doing before entering school and what will be expected at school? What is this contrast and what does it immediately create in the story?
The contrast is from the fun relaxing things he would do before school to the time passing, interesting things in school. This creates a sense of unawareness throughout the story.
The contrast is from the fun relaxing things he would do before school to the time passing, interesting things in school. This creates a sense of unawareness throughout the story.
2. The author continues this theme of contrast at the start of the story. How does he do this in his description of his experience of Sydney’s North Shore?
He continues this contrast at the start of the story with his experience of the North Shore by the dark ally ways and where all the mechanics drove their cars to his shiny clean shop.
He continues this contrast at the start of the story with his experience of the North Shore by the dark ally ways and where all the mechanics drove their cars to his shiny clean shop.
3. What was the father’s background in business before he opened the fruit shop? What has helped him become successful?
His fathers background in business was him working hard and unpacking crates and boxes of fruit and vegetables on and off trucks. What helped him become successful was working hard.
His fathers background in business was him working hard and unpacking crates and boxes of fruit and vegetables on and off trucks. What helped him become successful was working hard.
4. The narrator’s description of his father is complex. What makes the father a complex character?
What makes the father a complex character is the knowing about his work side but not much about him.
What makes the father a complex character is the knowing about his work side but not much about him.
5. (91) How does the author describe his role in doing ‘things that counted’?
The author describes his role is doing this that counted by standing back and listening to his/her siblings stories.
The author describes his role is doing this that counted by standing back and listening to his/her siblings stories.
6. What experience does the author have at school while keeping to himself? What does he learn from this experience?
not sure..
not sure..
7. How would you characterise the narrator’s tone in regards to the events that are occurring around him?
I would assume the narrator's tone in regards to the events that are occurring around him as sad, dull and slow. I don't think is something he/she would want to be talking about.
I would assume the narrator's tone in regards to the events that are occurring around him as sad, dull and slow. I don't think is something he/she would want to be talking about.
8. How does the narrator characterise the ways that one could ‘get the strap’ and ways that one could avoid it?
The narrator characterizes getting the strap as very easy and very hard to avoid getting it.
The narrator characterizes getting the strap as very easy and very hard to avoid getting it.
9. What event evokes a racist speech to the class by the teacher?
What evokes the racist speech is the note saying he/she cant go swimming.
What evokes the racist speech is the note saying he/she cant go swimming.
10. What effect did the author’s experience with ‘Strap Happy Jack’ have on him?
The effect Strap Happy Jack had on the author was positive. He didn't like him but it made him focus more.
The effect Strap Happy Jack had on the author was positive. He didn't like him but it made him focus more.
11. What was the one advantage school provided the author?
School provided the author with a sense of accomplishment and the life lesson of working hard which set him up for a lifetime of learning.
School provided the author with a sense of accomplishment and the life lesson of working hard which set him up for a lifetime of learning.
12. What did the author do at his school? What was his motivation for doing it? What did he feel was lacking at school?
The author created a workshop class for people to study together and helping them study well. He was motivated by his bad concentration. He thought that groups like these were lacking at the school because they could help.
The author created a workshop class for people to study together and helping them study well. He was motivated by his bad concentration. He thought that groups like these were lacking at the school because they could help.
13. What did the parents want their son to do at school? What did the author fear would happen by obeying his parents?
His parents wanted him to do as the teacher wanted him to do, not what he wanted to do, the author feared he wouldn't be able to be able to think for himself if he did that.
14. At school, what did the author learn about his own type of thinking and how to use it?His parents wanted him to do as the teacher wanted him to do, not what he wanted to do, the author feared he wouldn't be able to be able to think for himself if he did that.
not sure..
Friday, October 14, 2011
The Relative Advantages of Learning my Language by Amy Choi
1. The author opens the story with an anecdote. What is the anecdote and what effect does it have on the reader?
The anecdote was the story of her grandfather sitting down and the effect it has is that people understand more than you think.
The anecdote was the story of her grandfather sitting down and the effect it has is that people understand more than you think.
2. What is the author’s view of the Chinese language in the 2nd paragraph?
The author doesn't think the Chinese language language is relevant and doesn't like it.
The author doesn't think the Chinese language language is relevant and doesn't like it.
3. What is symbolic about the house that the Grandfather mistakes for his own? What does it say about the assimilation of his family into Australian culture? What does it say about his understanding of Australian culture? What is ironic about the inhabitants of this house?
Whats symbolic about the house is that all the descriptions are Asian-like and have Asian meaning. "the yellow bush". This says that his house in Australian culture stands out. What ironic about this house is the Asian characteristics.
Whats symbolic about the house is that all the descriptions are Asian-like and have Asian meaning. "the yellow bush". This says that his house in Australian culture stands out. What ironic about this house is the Asian characteristics.
4. What does the death of her grandfather inspire the author to do?
The death of her grandfather makes her learn Chinese.
The death of her grandfather makes her learn Chinese.
5. Why is she motivated to know Chinese? What is it she wants to ensure she is able to, regretting that she couldn’t do it with her grandfather?
She is motivated to know Chinese so that she respects her culture, she wants to ensure she can talk to people in Chinese if need be, she wants to know that she has that skill available.
She is motivated to know Chinese so that she respects her culture, she wants to ensure she can talk to people in Chinese if need be, she wants to know that she has that skill available.
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
The Early Settlers by Ken Chau
1. How does this title refer to two groups of ‘settlers’? Who are they?
Foreigners and natives
2. How is the first line of the poem successful at being ‘forceful’ regarding the Great-Grandfather’s presence in Australia?
The first line is forceful because it says he arrived in a short, precise manner it shows his standing.
The first line is forceful because it says he arrived in a short, precise manner it shows his standing.
3. What action are the ‘early settlers’ doing that gives them equally a strong presence?
The early settlers are entrenched which means they are in a strong position and can hardly be changed, it gives them a sense of power.
The early settlers are entrenched which means they are in a strong position and can hardly be changed, it gives them a sense of power.
4. How is the intention of the Great-Grandfather juxtaposed to the beliefs of the ‘early settlers’?
The great grandfather is going to farm and live but the early settlers thought he was a terrorist and a devil.
The great grandfather is going to farm and live but the early settlers thought he was a terrorist and a devil.
5. What action does the Great-Grandfather do that ties him both to the ‘early settlers’ and to his own culture?
He calls then bastards in their own language, it shows they both have similar slang. The "he" in the end is for both sides of view so the poem can be read from both sides of view. They're both scared of each other.
6. How does this short poem highlight the irony of the hatred that immigrants experience when they come to a 'settled' land like Australia?
It highlights the immigrants side of the experience and shows the intentions of them and what the settled sees them as
He calls then bastards in their own language, it shows they both have similar slang. The "he" in the end is for both sides of view so the poem can be read from both sides of view. They're both scared of each other.
6. How does this short poem highlight the irony of the hatred that immigrants experience when they come to a 'settled' land like Australia?
It highlights the immigrants side of the experience and shows the intentions of them and what the settled sees them as
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Growing Up Asian in Australia: Intro + Pigs Questions
Introduction by Alice Pung
1. What were Asian-Australians referred to as when the author was growing up?
The Asian -Australians were referreed to as power points.
The Asian -Australians were referreed to as power points.
2. How does she interpret this title?
She interprets this title as a cute face and as a smart person.
She interprets this title as a cute face and as a smart person.
3. What did this title actually refer to? Did the author find this demeaning? Why/why not?
This title refereed to the Asians actually looking like the power point, she didn't find this demeaning, she thought of it as a funny meaning and sort of cute, be she didn't know why they were called that because they were white.
This title refereed to the Asians actually looking like the power point, she didn't find this demeaning, she thought of it as a funny meaning and sort of cute, be she didn't know why they were called that because they were white.
4. ‘All that untapped potential! All that electrifying bra in power!’ What techniques are being employed by the author? How does they highlight he misunderstanding?
The techniques being used are exaggeration, repetition of 'all that', innocence of not knowing its a bad word. They highlight her misunderstanding because its a bad word but she thinks its good.
The techniques being used are exaggeration, repetition of 'all that', innocence of not knowing its a bad word. They highlight her misunderstanding because its a bad word but she thinks its good.
5. What did the teen author take away from teen fiction? What did she feel that she needed to do? Why? What does this say is essential to fitting in to a culture?
That the teen fiction books were stupid and put her down. She felt like she needed to have plastic surgery because she wasn't perfect. What this says about fitting in to a culture is that you have to be perfect.6. Who are the authors that she turns to? Why?
She turned to John Marsden and Robert Cormier because they wrote about honesty and real feelings about coming of age. 7. In the third paragraph how does the author use repetition. How does it highlight the focus of this book?
Parents, grand parents, great grand parents. The use of parents. This highlights the focus on the whole generation and every that had passed by being Asian-American was effected.
Parents, grand parents, great grand parents. The use of parents. This highlights the focus on the whole generation and every that had passed by being Asian-American was effected.
8. What metaphor does the author use to highlight the writers and the writing style in the third paragraph?
I can't find the metaphor
I can't find the metaphor
9. Why does the author use a quote in the 4th paragraph? What does it say about her reaction to the stories in the book?
The author uses a quote in the 4th paragraph to show that she has listened to others and if bring other people into this book and using their quotes. It tells us that her reactions to the story are that she feels for them and agrees with what they say.
The author uses a quote in the 4th paragraph to show that she has listened to others and if bring other people into this book and using their quotes. It tells us that her reactions to the story are that she feels for them and agrees with what they say.
10. On page 2 the author talks about the themes that she loosely choose for the collection. What are they and why is it ironic that they show up in this book?
Aussie Slang. They are the use of " the Battler, The pioneer, The legend.". Its ironic that they show up in this book because you would assume that Asians wouldn't use them but since they are Australian as well they do, and also because they're not white. 11. At the bottom of pg 3 on to page 4 the author says that sociologists have described Asians as the ‘model minority’. What is meant by this? What difficulties arise out of this label for young Asian-Australians?
This is meant that they are what you would call the minority of the public. The difficulties that arise from this is that they are automatically put in that genre and is hard to get out. It would make their life harder knowing that they are the minority.
This is meant that they are what you would call the minority of the public. The difficulties that arise from this is that they are automatically put in that genre and is hard to get out. It would make their life harder knowing that they are the minority.
12. What are the editor’s hopes for the collection of stories?
The editor's hope are that these stories help Asian-Australians through their every day battles and help them to know that there are many others.
The editor's hope are that these stories help Asian-Australians through their every day battles and help them to know that there are many others.
Pigs from Home by Hop Dac
1. How does the author start this story which is in direct contrast to the title of the story? What effect does this have on the reader and their expectations of the story?
The contrast of humans to animals, it tells us that this story will be quite different to the others and makes us expect something different.
The contrast of humans to animals, it tells us that this story will be quite different to the others and makes us expect something different.
2. What core Vietnamese value is instilled in the author?
A good Vietnamese family is a sustained one.
A good Vietnamese family is a sustained one.
3. What is humorous about the mother’s ‘flair for natural medicine’ in regards to her personality?
What's humorous about the mother's flair for natural medicine in regards to her personality is because she cares too much for them.
What's humorous about the mother's flair for natural medicine in regards to her personality is because she cares too much for them.
4. How does the description of the killing of pigeons continue the style utilised in the introduction of the story?
It shows the brutality and the harshness of the theme of the story.
It shows the brutality and the harshness of the theme of the story.
5. What is the author’s opinion of pigs? Give two quotes to support your conclusion.
The author does not like pigs at all.
eg 1. "No pig has ever been a friend of mine"
eg 2. "repugnant beast: The Pig"
The author does not like pigs at all.
eg 1. "No pig has ever been a friend of mine"
eg 2. "repugnant beast: The Pig"
6. In the paragraph on pgs 53-54, give two examples of alliteration employed by the author.
1. Pushed the poultry.
2. Blowing raspberries of bellies on babies.
1. Pushed the poultry.
2. Blowing raspberries of bellies on babies.
7. On pg 54 what simile is used to describe pigs? How does this simile work for the situation it is used?
A pig is like the ocean: don't ever put your back on it. This simile works for the situation it is used in because the ocean is dangerous and the pig is dangerous, also because the chicken put its back on the pig.
A pig is like the ocean: don't ever put your back on it. This simile works for the situation it is used in because the ocean is dangerous and the pig is dangerous, also because the chicken put its back on the pig.
8. What simile does the author use to describe her mother sunning herself? How does this relate to the core focus of the story?
Turning herself like a rotisserie chicken. This relates to the core focus of the story because they are talking about chickens and also because the animals represent people?
Turning herself like a rotisserie chicken. This relates to the core focus of the story because they are talking about chickens and also because the animals represent people?
9. What does the author describe as ‘the divide between the old world and the new’? What do you think is meant by this statement?
The author describes the new and old worlds as growing up. I think this statement means that the author is growing up and that question divides that.
The author describes the new and old worlds as growing up. I think this statement means that the author is growing up and that question divides that.
10. What is the author’s reaction to the slaughter of the pig at night? What statement does the author make about the neighbours which displays the way he feels about the whole experience? What is important about including this statement?
The author is surprised and disgusted. He wonders if the neighbors can hear, this displays that he is sort of ashamed about the whole experience. Its important to include this statement because he feels guilty about the killing of the pig.
The author is surprised and disgusted. He wonders if the neighbors can hear, this displays that he is sort of ashamed about the whole experience. Its important to include this statement because he feels guilty about the killing of the pig.
11. Why don’t the parents have pigs anymore? How does this relate to the description of the burial of the last pig they owned?
The parents don't have anymore pigs because they all died and they didn't want to kill anymore pigs. This related to the burial of the last pig they owned because it was unfairly killed and they just tossed him in the grave.
The parents don't have anymore pigs because they all died and they didn't want to kill anymore pigs. This related to the burial of the last pig they owned because it was unfairly killed and they just tossed him in the grave.
12. How would you characterise the description of the mother’s treatment of the pig’s blood? Is it appetising?
I would characterise it as weird.. i don't find it appetising at all.
I would characterise it as weird.. i don't find it appetising at all.
13. What is ironic about the way the author has a popular Vietnamese dish? What is it about the way the author describes the experience of having pigs that makes it ironic?
What's ironic about the Vietnamese dish is that they're in Australia.
What's ironic about the Vietnamese dish is that they're in Australia.
14. How does this story relate to the title Pigs from Home?
The story relates to Pigs from home because the author is calling Australia their home and the pigs are from there, no matter where he has the dish, he links the pig to Australia.
The story relates to Pigs from home because the author is calling Australia their home and the pigs are from there, no matter where he has the dish, he links the pig to Australia.
15. Why do you think this story is in the Battlers section of the book?
I think the story is in the Battlers section of the book because it would have been a hard time to endure the death of the pigs and also because the author battles through the memories of the pigs squeal. Also, because the the pigs battle through their life.
I think the story is in the Battlers section of the book because it would have been a hard time to endure the death of the pigs and also because the author battles through the memories of the pigs squeal. Also, because the the pigs battle through their life.
Thursday, September 8, 2011
Writing letters
Pretend that the father resigned when Bruno couldn't be found. What would the letter to the 'Fury' be like?
Dear Fuhrer,
It is in my great condolences and pains me to say it, but after the loss of my only son, who i loved dearly, i have to resign from my job. I hope you understand that this is a tough time for me and I don't want to lose my daughter too. This isn't a place for kids to be around as we can see. I want to do what I can for the fatherland but through the loss of my son I have seen how bad this place can be, it has hit me with surprise. Again I hope you understand and can see the position I am in.
Regards, Commander ______
Write a letter from Gretel to Bruno after he went missing.
Dear Bruno,
No one knows where you have gone, i miss you very much, although I annoy you a lot and make life hard for you, I love you and want you to come back. I know you probably won't get this letter but i had to tell you some way that after all these years. I know you might not believe me, but I always had your feelings in consideration whenever i did something to annoy you. I do it because sometimes at home i get lonely and its the only way i know how to interact with you. Please come home. I miss you, mother misses you, father misses you, Maria misses you, everyone misses you Bruno. Please come home.
I hope you get this letter
Love Gretel
Dear Fuhrer,
It is in my great condolences and pains me to say it, but after the loss of my only son, who i loved dearly, i have to resign from my job. I hope you understand that this is a tough time for me and I don't want to lose my daughter too. This isn't a place for kids to be around as we can see. I want to do what I can for the fatherland but through the loss of my son I have seen how bad this place can be, it has hit me with surprise. Again I hope you understand and can see the position I am in.
Regards, Commander ______
Write a letter from Gretel to Bruno after he went missing.
Dear Bruno,
No one knows where you have gone, i miss you very much, although I annoy you a lot and make life hard for you, I love you and want you to come back. I know you probably won't get this letter but i had to tell you some way that after all these years. I know you might not believe me, but I always had your feelings in consideration whenever i did something to annoy you. I do it because sometimes at home i get lonely and its the only way i know how to interact with you. Please come home. I miss you, mother misses you, father misses you, Maria misses you, everyone misses you Bruno. Please come home.
I hope you get this letter
Love Gretel
Monday, September 5, 2011
Holocaust Art: "It Takes But One" by Elizabeth Denholm and Alyssa Dziurlaj
What visual techniques are employed in this painting?
In this painting the artist used the colour contrast between red and black, vectors, font choice, focal points, symbolism and facial expressions (the lack of).
How do these visual techniques highlight major thematic elements of holocaust art and literature?
These visual techniques highlight major thematic elements of the holocaust art and literature by using no facial expressions, which emphasizes that in the holocaust, everyone was considered the same and just things, their facial expressions of happy/sad/pain did not matter. Also the vectors of the arm and the dripping paint point us towards the focal points of the main person that's coloured in and also the star of David, the Jewish symbol. The name of the artwork "It takes but one" could mean many things but the way i interpreted this was it only takes one person to stand up or to say something to come out of the shadows of the rest of the population to say no, this is wrong, and it might have made a large impact on the Holocaust. The shadow of the population being the other people in the background. Although it could also mean that it only takes one Jew to do something about the Holocaust, yet i'm sure many tried and got killed. The red at the bottom could also mean many things, happy things like love and hope and compassion, but also bad things like hell and blood. The dripping paint shows us the transportation from the dark black crown and the lonely white crowd with the star of David, the dripping black lines are vectors for the star and they draw us to look at the star and the hand. The hand is something i'm not sure for what its doing, it could be a Jewish hand reaching out for that one person of the German side to actually say something and speak up, the hand is reaching for hope and forgiveness which ties in with the red, but it could also be the hand of a Nazi silencing the Jew trying to speak up. The faded font and the messy font secures this idea of it never happened and its fading away like its not going to happen and the hope for the one to do something is slowing dying away.
Holocaust Poetry #3: 'Daniel' by Laura Crist
How is juxtaposition used in this poem to highlight an important theme of Holocaust literature?
Juxtaposition is used at the ending because its a sort of colourful and bright text then the ending is just sharp and brutal. It shows the difference between the nice boy and then death. The theme it highlights is the inhumane and brutality of the Holocaust. This poem symbolises the Holocaust life. The use of taking a long time to describe the boy and taking the majority of the poem to do so really enhances the bond we get between the two, almost like mother and son. Then the quick three last lines it all ends really highlights the juxtaposition.
How is descriptive language used to enhance the reader's reaction to the poem?Descriptive language is used to enhance the reader's reaction to the poem because it brings us into the mothers thoughts and makes us more sympathetic of the mother and how she has to get her child ready for death. It highlights the normality of everyone and the love for people, friends and family.
Juxtaposition is used at the ending because its a sort of colourful and bright text then the ending is just sharp and brutal. It shows the difference between the nice boy and then death. The theme it highlights is the inhumane and brutality of the Holocaust. This poem symbolises the Holocaust life. The use of taking a long time to describe the boy and taking the majority of the poem to do so really enhances the bond we get between the two, almost like mother and son. Then the quick three last lines it all ends really highlights the juxtaposition.
How is descriptive language used to enhance the reader's reaction to the poem?Descriptive language is used to enhance the reader's reaction to the poem because it brings us into the mothers thoughts and makes us more sympathetic of the mother and how she has to get her child ready for death. It highlights the normality of everyone and the love for people, friends and family.
Daniel
Laura Crist
And the child held her hand
A child tiny for almost eight,
Deep blue eyes that dominated his face,
When he explained new events to her,
that funny doggy,
that pretty rock,
And the freckles on his cheek,
No one saw a sunrise more perfect,
to her,
She so vividly smells the fragrance of
his hair,
his ears,
his breath in the morning
She vividly hears that little heartbeat,
that was hers
always hers,
and the laughter,
that raspy little laugh,
when he caught her in a conundrum.
All this,
But this is merely the surface,
As she watches her little God sheared,
and stripped,
For the gas chamber.
Saturday, September 3, 2011
Chapter 15: Something He Shouldn't Have Done
(163) Why doesn't Bruno like Kotler? What does he observe and not understand about Kotler when his father is away?
Bruno doesn't like Kotler because he calls him little man and also because Kotler acts like its his house when Father is away. Bruno doesn't understand why Kotler pretends its his house and runs the place when father is away.
(163) What is meant when Kotler uses the cliche 'Don't worry, this one knows which side his bread is buttered on.'?
To be loyal to the person or thing that will benefit you the most
(165) How would you describe the interaction between Kotler and Bruno?
I would describe the interaction to be awkward and one sided, its Kotler asking all the question and Bruno just answering them and not saying anything else.
(166) What surprise does Bruno get?
Bruno is surprised that Shmuel is in his house in his kitchen
(167) How is juxtaposition used when Bruno compares his hand to Shmuel's?
Juxtaposition is used when Bruno compares his hands with Shmuel because Bruno's are lively and full and fat and Shmuels are skeleton like and skinny and horrible.
(168-9) Does Bruno understand the pressure that Shmuel is under?
No not at all, he thinks its a very laid back situation and Shmuel and can to him and eat etc.
(171-2) What dramatic situation unfolds and what is Bruno's reaction?
Kotler walks in to see the two boys talking and he also Kotler starts yelling at Shmuel, Bruno's reaction to this is him just standing there stunned not knowing why its all happening.
(173-4) What does Bruno think of himself because of the way he reacts? How is the major theme 'fear' portrayed in this scene? What does it do to Bruno and Shmuel?
Bruno thinks of himself as a coward and hes ashamed of himself for not standing up for his friend. The major theme fear is portrayed in this scene because Bruno is fearful of Kotler and doesn't want to be in trouble and doesn't know what to do and goes back to them "better him and me" form of mind. What this does to Bruno and Shmuel is have an awkward sort of barrier because Shmuel knows that Bruno will not stick up for him even though he forgives Bruno later on.
(175) What does Bruno say that prompts Shmuel to offer his hand in friendship? How is this symbolic?
He says hes sorry again and again and the last times he says it he refers to Shmuel as his friend and says he's ashamed of himself. This is symbolic because its the first time they've touched and also the first time they've refereed to each other as friends.
Bruno doesn't like Kotler because he calls him little man and also because Kotler acts like its his house when Father is away. Bruno doesn't understand why Kotler pretends its his house and runs the place when father is away.
(163) What is meant when Kotler uses the cliche 'Don't worry, this one knows which side his bread is buttered on.'?
To be loyal to the person or thing that will benefit you the most
(165) How would you describe the interaction between Kotler and Bruno?
I would describe the interaction to be awkward and one sided, its Kotler asking all the question and Bruno just answering them and not saying anything else.
(166) What surprise does Bruno get?
Bruno is surprised that Shmuel is in his house in his kitchen
(167) How is juxtaposition used when Bruno compares his hand to Shmuel's?
Juxtaposition is used when Bruno compares his hands with Shmuel because Bruno's are lively and full and fat and Shmuels are skeleton like and skinny and horrible.
(168-9) Does Bruno understand the pressure that Shmuel is under?
No not at all, he thinks its a very laid back situation and Shmuel and can to him and eat etc.
(171-2) What dramatic situation unfolds and what is Bruno's reaction?
Kotler walks in to see the two boys talking and he also Kotler starts yelling at Shmuel, Bruno's reaction to this is him just standing there stunned not knowing why its all happening.
(173-4) What does Bruno think of himself because of the way he reacts? How is the major theme 'fear' portrayed in this scene? What does it do to Bruno and Shmuel?
Bruno thinks of himself as a coward and hes ashamed of himself for not standing up for his friend. The major theme fear is portrayed in this scene because Bruno is fearful of Kotler and doesn't want to be in trouble and doesn't know what to do and goes back to them "better him and me" form of mind. What this does to Bruno and Shmuel is have an awkward sort of barrier because Shmuel knows that Bruno will not stick up for him even though he forgives Bruno later on.
(175) What does Bruno say that prompts Shmuel to offer his hand in friendship? How is this symbolic?
He says hes sorry again and again and the last times he says it he refers to Shmuel as his friend and says he's ashamed of himself. This is symbolic because its the first time they've touched and also the first time they've refereed to each other as friends.
Chapter 14: Bruno Tells a Perfectly Reasonable Lie
(150-1) What information do we get that makes the reader start to feel that he is becoming less innocent and more ignorant?
He sneaks out of home and sees Shmuel and when he sees something wrong with Shmuel he assumes he's ok and doesn't ask.
(151-3) What is interesting about the weather and how does it relate to the overall emotion of this stage in the book?
The weather is a rainy and it relates to the overall emotion of this stage of the book because its sad and weary because Pavel has died and Shmuel is injured and its just not a happy time.
(153) What does Bruno accidentally say to Gretel?
Bruno accidently says that Bruno has a friend, but he covers it up by saying his friend is imaginary.
(154-5) Is Bruno able to consider Gretel's feelings? How do you know?
I not too sure but i think yes he is because hes trying to make her think hes embarrassed and can make her think he is.
(155) What is it that motivates Bruno not to tell Gretel the truth? How does this portray Bruno as being selfish?
What motivates him is the fact that he doesn't want to share Shmuel as a friend and wants Shmuel to himself. This portrays Bruno as being selfish because that is an act of selfishness and it shows he doesn't want his sister to be happy.
(158) What is it that Bruno realises when he starts recounting what Shmuel tells him? Why do you think that this is when he finally starts to realise what Shmuel is experiencing?
Bruno realises that it's sad and must be really hard for Shmuel to tell him. I think that this is when he finally realises what Shmuel is experiencing because its different when you say it yourself and think about it and process it more, Bruno is picturing it more and taking it in more than if he was just hearing it from Shmuel.
(159) What is ironic and hypocritical about what Gretel tells Bruno regarding imaginary friends?
Whats ironic and hypocritical about Gretel telling Bruno about imaginary friends is that she talks to her dolls which can't talk at all and she pretends that they're talking back to her. Its the same concept.
He sneaks out of home and sees Shmuel and when he sees something wrong with Shmuel he assumes he's ok and doesn't ask.
(151-3) What is interesting about the weather and how does it relate to the overall emotion of this stage in the book?
The weather is a rainy and it relates to the overall emotion of this stage of the book because its sad and weary because Pavel has died and Shmuel is injured and its just not a happy time.
(153) What does Bruno accidentally say to Gretel?
Bruno accidently says that Bruno has a friend, but he covers it up by saying his friend is imaginary.
(154-5) Is Bruno able to consider Gretel's feelings? How do you know?
I not too sure but i think yes he is because hes trying to make her think hes embarrassed and can make her think he is.
(155) What is it that motivates Bruno not to tell Gretel the truth? How does this portray Bruno as being selfish?
What motivates him is the fact that he doesn't want to share Shmuel as a friend and wants Shmuel to himself. This portrays Bruno as being selfish because that is an act of selfishness and it shows he doesn't want his sister to be happy.
(158) What is it that Bruno realises when he starts recounting what Shmuel tells him? Why do you think that this is when he finally starts to realise what Shmuel is experiencing?
Bruno realises that it's sad and must be really hard for Shmuel to tell him. I think that this is when he finally realises what Shmuel is experiencing because its different when you say it yourself and think about it and process it more, Bruno is picturing it more and taking it in more than if he was just hearing it from Shmuel.
(159) What is ironic and hypocritical about what Gretel tells Bruno regarding imaginary friends?
Whats ironic and hypocritical about Gretel telling Bruno about imaginary friends is that she talks to her dolls which can't talk at all and she pretends that they're talking back to her. Its the same concept.
Chapter 13: The Bottle of Wine
(134) How does the initial paragraph frame Bruno's state of mind?
The initial paragraph shows Bruno has pretty much given up on going back to Berlin and he wont be seeing his friends any time soon.
(136) What does the question Bruno asks Maria show about his development?
The question Bruno asked Maria shows Bruno's development about becoming more aware and more curious about whats actually happening where he is and he's curious about the people, he's thinking about things more.
(137) What is important about Maria's reaction to Bruno's question?
Whats important is that she doesn't want to say anything about him being a Jew because she doesn't want to feel awkward and she doesn't know if shes allowed so she waits for him to make his question more direct.
(138) Why does Bruno want to tell Shmuel about Pavel? What does this highlight about Bruno's understanding of what is going on?
Bruno wants to tell Shmuel about Pavel because he wants him to know hes a nice man etc also because Maria had just told a secret about him to Bruno. This highlights that Bruno doesn't know whats going on because he thinks there's only a few people over there and every knows everyone and talks to them all - which is untrue.(140) What do the boys argue about? Who does Bruno defend? Who is right/wrong? Why?
The boys argue that there are/aren't and good soldiers. Bruno defends his father by repeating "except my Father". In this argument I think that they're both ride because from Bruno's perspective, he is right and same for Shmuel. Shmuel is on the bad end so of course he's going to think they're all bad.
(140) Shmuel says 'You don't know what it's like here.' and Bruno reacts by saying 'You don't have any sisters, do you?' He says this to avoid an answer to Shmuel. What does this show about Bruno's understanding of what is happening?
This shows that Bruno still doesn't understand whats happening because he doesn't take those words in and just changes the subject because he thinks Shmuel is just saying that.
(141) What connection do the boys have regarding Lt. Kotler?
The connection the boys have with Lt. Kotler are that they both dislike him.
(142) What has changed in the the way Bruno sees Pavel?
What's changed in the way that Bruno sees Pavel is that he has sympathy for him, and he notices him and can see that he's not happy and actually sees him as a person, unlike Kotler and Father who just think of him as a slave.
(143) What important words are used to describe the way the father eats and addresses Bruno? What makes them important? How do they relate to the scene and the father as a character?
"attacking a leg of lamb" - a vicious motion
"no son of mine" - not giving him respect and using his name
What makes these important is that is gives us more detail about the scene ad ads just that bit more of drama into the scene and suspense. These relate to Father as a character because it continues his mean look and personality and also his to the point nature.
(145) We learn Lt. Kotler's first name - 'Kurt'. What is it about the sounds in his full name that are important? 'Kurt Kotler'
Alliteration is used to make him stand out a bit more and seem even more important.
(146-7) What do we learn about Kotler's father? What is Bruno's father's reaction/suggestion regarding Kotler's father leaving Germany for Switzerland?
We learn that Kotlers father left Germany at the start of the War and he doesn't talk to Lt. Kotler anymore. Bruno's father reacts in a serious and curious manner regarding why he would leave the "fatherland" in its time of need. He suggests that Kotler's father might have been anti Germany or a Jew.
(148) What happens to break the tension at the dinner table? What does Kotler do and what are everyone's reactions? What does Bruno decide regarding disagreeing with anyone anymore after seeing what happens to Kotler? What does this relate to historically in regards to the Nazis?
Gretel says she wants to visit Switzerland then Pavel goes to fill up the wine glasses and spills it on Kotler's lap. Kotler yells at Pavel and we assume he kills him or hurts him very badly. Everyone just sits there and doesn't do anything because they are scared. He decided not to disagree with anyone if that's what happens at Out With. This relates to people not speaking up for whats wrong and just staying quiet because "its better off them than me".
The initial paragraph shows Bruno has pretty much given up on going back to Berlin and he wont be seeing his friends any time soon.
(136) What does the question Bruno asks Maria show about his development?
The question Bruno asked Maria shows Bruno's development about becoming more aware and more curious about whats actually happening where he is and he's curious about the people, he's thinking about things more.
(137) What is important about Maria's reaction to Bruno's question?
Whats important is that she doesn't want to say anything about him being a Jew because she doesn't want to feel awkward and she doesn't know if shes allowed so she waits for him to make his question more direct.
(138) Why does Bruno want to tell Shmuel about Pavel? What does this highlight about Bruno's understanding of what is going on?
Bruno wants to tell Shmuel about Pavel because he wants him to know hes a nice man etc also because Maria had just told a secret about him to Bruno. This highlights that Bruno doesn't know whats going on because he thinks there's only a few people over there and every knows everyone and talks to them all - which is untrue.(140) What do the boys argue about? Who does Bruno defend? Who is right/wrong? Why?
The boys argue that there are/aren't and good soldiers. Bruno defends his father by repeating "except my Father". In this argument I think that they're both ride because from Bruno's perspective, he is right and same for Shmuel. Shmuel is on the bad end so of course he's going to think they're all bad.
(140) Shmuel says 'You don't know what it's like here.' and Bruno reacts by saying 'You don't have any sisters, do you?' He says this to avoid an answer to Shmuel. What does this show about Bruno's understanding of what is happening?
This shows that Bruno still doesn't understand whats happening because he doesn't take those words in and just changes the subject because he thinks Shmuel is just saying that.
(141) What connection do the boys have regarding Lt. Kotler?
The connection the boys have with Lt. Kotler are that they both dislike him.
(142) What has changed in the the way Bruno sees Pavel?
What's changed in the way that Bruno sees Pavel is that he has sympathy for him, and he notices him and can see that he's not happy and actually sees him as a person, unlike Kotler and Father who just think of him as a slave.
(143) What important words are used to describe the way the father eats and addresses Bruno? What makes them important? How do they relate to the scene and the father as a character?
"attacking a leg of lamb" - a vicious motion
"no son of mine" - not giving him respect and using his name
What makes these important is that is gives us more detail about the scene ad ads just that bit more of drama into the scene and suspense. These relate to Father as a character because it continues his mean look and personality and also his to the point nature.
(145) We learn Lt. Kotler's first name - 'Kurt'. What is it about the sounds in his full name that are important? 'Kurt Kotler'
Alliteration is used to make him stand out a bit more and seem even more important.
(146-7) What do we learn about Kotler's father? What is Bruno's father's reaction/suggestion regarding Kotler's father leaving Germany for Switzerland?
We learn that Kotlers father left Germany at the start of the War and he doesn't talk to Lt. Kotler anymore. Bruno's father reacts in a serious and curious manner regarding why he would leave the "fatherland" in its time of need. He suggests that Kotler's father might have been anti Germany or a Jew.
(148) What happens to break the tension at the dinner table? What does Kotler do and what are everyone's reactions? What does Bruno decide regarding disagreeing with anyone anymore after seeing what happens to Kotler? What does this relate to historically in regards to the Nazis?
Gretel says she wants to visit Switzerland then Pavel goes to fill up the wine glasses and spills it on Kotler's lap. Kotler yells at Pavel and we assume he kills him or hurts him very badly. Everyone just sits there and doesn't do anything because they are scared. He decided not to disagree with anyone if that's what happens at Out With. This relates to people not speaking up for whats wrong and just staying quiet because "its better off them than me".
Friday, September 2, 2011
Chapter 12: Shmuel Thinks of an Answer to Bruno's Question
(126) How would you compare Shmuel's voice to Bruno's?
I would compare Shmuel's voice to Bruno's as Bruno's being quite posh and proper and then Shmuel's being quiet and sad and not very well spoken.
(128-130) How would you describe the way that Bruno acts and reacts to Shmuel tell his story about coming to the camp?
I think Bruno's acts like its no big deal and its quite fun - which it would'nt be - and he doesn't really react to it at all.
(131) When Bruno and Shmuel talk about chocolate how is Bruno portrayed?
Bruno is portrayed as a snobby rich kid
(132) Do you think that Bruno understands the situation that Shmuel is in?
No not at all
(133) What is ironic about Bruno thinking 'the last think he wanted to do was be unkind to Shmuel'?
This is ironic because Bruno is on the Serman side and its the Germans that put him in the camp.
(133) What is ironic about the statement - 'Bruno was of the opinion that when it came to parents, and especially when it came to sisters, what they didn't know couldn't hurt them.'?What's ironic about this is that they already know more than Bruno and understand everything better.
I would compare Shmuel's voice to Bruno's as Bruno's being quite posh and proper and then Shmuel's being quiet and sad and not very well spoken.
(128-130) How would you describe the way that Bruno acts and reacts to Shmuel tell his story about coming to the camp?
I think Bruno's acts like its no big deal and its quite fun - which it would'nt be - and he doesn't really react to it at all.
(131) When Bruno and Shmuel talk about chocolate how is Bruno portrayed?
Bruno is portrayed as a snobby rich kid
(132) Do you think that Bruno understands the situation that Shmuel is in?
No not at all
(133) What is ironic about Bruno thinking 'the last think he wanted to do was be unkind to Shmuel'?
This is ironic because Bruno is on the Serman side and its the Germans that put him in the camp.
(133) What is ironic about the statement - 'Bruno was of the opinion that when it came to parents, and especially when it came to sisters, what they didn't know couldn't hurt them.'?What's ironic about this is that they already know more than Bruno and understand everything better.
Chapter 11: The Fury
(118) What does the mother's obsession with her 'list' represent? What does the list distract her from? What do you think about meeting Adolf Hitler?
not sure why
(120) What is ironic when the father says 'The last thing we need is for either of you to start behaving like children.'?
Whats ironic about this is because they are children.
(121) How is juxtaposition used in the introduction of 'The Fury'?
Juxtaposition is used in the introduction of the Fury because of Eva being the opposite of him.
(122) How is the 'Fury's' behavior juxtaposed with everyone else'?
The Furys behavior is juxtaposed to Eva's because he is mean and angry and she is nice and cares about the kids.
(123) Is this a stereotypical representation of Hitler? Why/why not?
Yes it is, is it because this is how he is always portrayed in books/movies.
(124) We are given a very abbreviated discussion between the mother and father. What are they talking about? What are their views on the topic? What effect does showing the parents conversation in this manner rather than the whole conversation?
They are talking about moving to Out With. Mothers view on the topic is that she doesn't want to and Father is the complete opposite and it trying to make Mother think that's its a good idea. It shows Bruno's innocence not know everything about whats going on and it also has the effect of him not wanting to know whats going on.
not sure why
(120) What is ironic when the father says 'The last thing we need is for either of you to start behaving like children.'?
Whats ironic about this is because they are children.
(121) How is juxtaposition used in the introduction of 'The Fury'?
Juxtaposition is used in the introduction of the Fury because of Eva being the opposite of him.
(122) How is the 'Fury's' behavior juxtaposed with everyone else'?
The Furys behavior is juxtaposed to Eva's because he is mean and angry and she is nice and cares about the kids.
(123) Is this a stereotypical representation of Hitler? Why/why not?
Yes it is, is it because this is how he is always portrayed in books/movies.
(124) We are given a very abbreviated discussion between the mother and father. What are they talking about? What are their views on the topic? What effect does showing the parents conversation in this manner rather than the whole conversation?
They are talking about moving to Out With. Mothers view on the topic is that she doesn't want to and Father is the complete opposite and it trying to make Mother think that's its a good idea. It shows Bruno's innocence not know everything about whats going on and it also has the effect of him not wanting to know whats going on.
Evaluating your Partner's Performance
During the conversation you are to take notes on:
TIM BUTLER
- participation
not much participation but he tried when he knew what to say.
- what questions/answers they ask
he asked 1 question about Bruno and answered a question about irony.
- do they know what they are talking about
sort of...
- overall what is your impression of their understanding of what is happening in the chapter
i think that his understanding of the book is that they are having a discussion about their lives
Give your partner an HONEST score out of 10 (10 being the best).
6
TIM BUTLER
- participation
not much participation but he tried when he knew what to say.
- what questions/answers they ask
he asked 1 question about Bruno and answered a question about irony.
- do they know what they are talking about
sort of...
- overall what is your impression of their understanding of what is happening in the chapter
i think that his understanding of the book is that they are having a discussion about their lives
Give your partner an HONEST score out of 10 (10 being the best).
6
Monday, August 29, 2011
Chapters 11+12
What are the main themes of the novel so far?
Innocence. Inhumane treatment. Friendships. Fear. Ignorance.
What are the main techniques?
Allusion, juxtaposition, imagery, alliteration, simile, irony.
Think of 5 important questions for each of these two chapters about how important motifs and themes play a role in each chapter.
Chapter 11
1. Who is the Fury?
2. How is the Fury portrayed?
3. How is juxtaposition used form the Fury to Eva?
4. On page 124 what are mother and father talking about?
5. Why did they repeat the last paragraph from when it was used in the first chapter?
Chapter 12
1. Juxtaposition is strong in this chapter, why?
2. How is Bruno's innocence used in this chapter?
3. Why is it important that Bruno and Shmuel are kids?
4. Why doesn't Bruno want to tell his parents about his adventure?
5. Why doesn't Bruno believe Shmuel about the room with 11 people
Chapter 11
1. Who is the Fury?
2. How is the Fury portrayed?
3. How is juxtaposition used form the Fury to Eva?
4. On page 124 what are mother and father talking about?
5. Why did they repeat the last paragraph from when it was used in the first chapter?
Chapter 12
1. Juxtaposition is strong in this chapter, why?
2. How is Bruno's innocence used in this chapter?
3. Why is it important that Bruno and Shmuel are kids?
4. Why doesn't Bruno want to tell his parents about his adventure?
5. Why doesn't Bruno believe Shmuel about the room with 11 people
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Chapter 10: The Dot That Became a...
(105) What does the progression of 'dot' to 'boy' tell us about the role of exploring and meeting the people in the camp? What does this represent about how other Germans view the Jews?
The progression of the dot to boy tells us that Bruno's sense of exploration is important and allows him to meet new people and find answers he's been searching for. This represents the other Germans views of Jews as just an object to explore. The development of becoming more important.
(109) What effect does the boys both having the same birthday have?
The boys having the same birthday represents the similarity of people put into the camp and people outside of the camp. It shows us that Shmuel and Bruno are actually quite alike. They have a connection with each other, due to Bruno's innocence.
(113-4) What do Bruno and Shmuel 'argue' about? What does Bruno decide to stop the argument?
Bruno and Shmuel argue about German being the greatest country. Bruno decides to stop the argument because he doesn't want to sound rude in front of his new friend and he wants to make the most out of talking to someone on the other side of the fence. The comment of "let agree to disagree" is a microcosm of the war and why its happening.
(115) What does Bruno's last question reveal to Shmuel? What do you think Shmuel thinks of Bruno because of asking this question?
Bruno's last question reveals to Shmuel that Bruno doesn't know whats happening and who he is. I think Shmuel thinks of Bruno as an ignorant German and also innocent.
The progression of the dot to boy tells us that Bruno's sense of exploration is important and allows him to meet new people and find answers he's been searching for. This represents the other Germans views of Jews as just an object to explore. The development of becoming more important.
(109) What effect does the boys both having the same birthday have?
The boys having the same birthday represents the similarity of people put into the camp and people outside of the camp. It shows us that Shmuel and Bruno are actually quite alike. They have a connection with each other, due to Bruno's innocence.
(113-4) What do Bruno and Shmuel 'argue' about? What does Bruno decide to stop the argument?
Bruno and Shmuel argue about German being the greatest country. Bruno decides to stop the argument because he doesn't want to sound rude in front of his new friend and he wants to make the most out of talking to someone on the other side of the fence. The comment of "let agree to disagree" is a microcosm of the war and why its happening.
(115) What does Bruno's last question reveal to Shmuel? What do you think Shmuel thinks of Bruno because of asking this question?
Bruno's last question reveals to Shmuel that Bruno doesn't know whats happening and who he is. I think Shmuel thinks of Bruno as an ignorant German and also innocent.
Chapter 9: Bruno Remembers That He Used to Enjoy Exploration
(pg95-96) How is Lt Kotler portrayed? Why is he portrayed this way? (remember that 'how' is asking about literary techniques)
Lt Kotler is portrayed as the typical soldier from the Holocaust. They use alliteration to emphasize it. He is also portrayed as arrogant. He is also kind of portrayed as a suck up.
What is Herr Liszt going to 'change' for Bruno? (98)
Herr Liszt is going to change Bruno's knowledge of the Holocaust and the German history.
(100) What connection does Bruno make between the people in the camp and the people that come and visit his house all the time?
Bruno thinks that the people in the camp are working for the men that come and visit him all the time. He thinks is a game.
What some of the things that Bruno begins to take notice of regarding the relationship between the soldiers and the people in 'pyjamas'?
Bruno starts to notice that the soldiers tell the people in pyjamas what to do and they're their bosses. "master and slave" he notices that there is a dominant side but he is unsure why and doesn't know who chooses who side people are on.
Lt Kotler is portrayed as the typical soldier from the Holocaust. They use alliteration to emphasize it. He is also portrayed as arrogant. He is also kind of portrayed as a suck up.
What is Herr Liszt going to 'change' for Bruno? (98)
Herr Liszt is going to change Bruno's knowledge of the Holocaust and the German history.
(100) What connection does Bruno make between the people in the camp and the people that come and visit his house all the time?
Bruno thinks that the people in the camp are working for the men that come and visit him all the time. He thinks is a game.
What some of the things that Bruno begins to take notice of regarding the relationship between the soldiers and the people in 'pyjamas'?
Bruno starts to notice that the soldiers tell the people in pyjamas what to do and they're their bosses. "master and slave" he notices that there is a dominant side but he is unsure why and doesn't know who chooses who side people are on.
Friday, August 26, 2011
Chapter 7: How Mother Took Credit for Something She Hadn't Done
Mother's defense of Herr Roller is ironic because she deeply cares about him because he is less able and is defenseless against Bruno yet the camp is right next to them and her husband is running it.
Kotler represents the ignorant and bad Germans. and the "perfect" German
Kotler juxtaposes Maria because Kotler is a bad evil German that orders around the Jews and thinks nothing of them and uses bad words which Bruno doesn't even know towards them whilst Maria is a kind German that thinks well of everyone and is trying to keep Bruno out of trouble and is doing what she thinks is right.
Bruno is interested and wants to know more about Pavel and has a feeling that Pavel is an interesting man. He also gets confused with Pavel for why he isn't in a hospital because he doesn't understand why Pavel is there. He also talks to Pavel as sort of a friend and can understand him a bit more.
Juxtaposition is a key technique in the Holocaust text because it helps us see both sides of what it was like for the Germans and for the Jews. It has been used in The Boy is stripped PJ's by describing everything to do with the Jews or the camp by describing one side then the other to highlight all the key differences.
Wednesday, August 24, 2011
Chapter 6 - The Overpaid Maid
- On pg 60 Bruno reveals a radical shift in his perspective and understanding of Maria. What is this radical shift? What does this show is developing in Bruno?
This radical shift is realising that Maria is a person and has a history and feelings and has a life of her own not just a maid. This shows that Bruno is starting to understand things and people better and he is maturing.
- Compare how Bruno and Gretel treat Maria.
Bruno and Gretel treat Maria very differently. Bruno gives Maria respect and tries to be polite with her, he treats her like a person and someone that deserves respect. Gretel treats Maria as nothing but a maid and a servant. She treats her disrespectfully and shows no sign of manners towards her. - (pg 65) What is Maria's advice to Bruno about 'keeping safe'? Why do you think that she gives this advice? Do you think that it is good or bad advice?
Maria's advice to Bruno is to keep quiet and not saying anything he feels about the move to anyone or even out loud at all. I think she gives this advice because either she might get in trouble for it for talking to him or maybe because shes trying to look out for Bruno and doesn't want Bruno getting in trouble. I think this is good advice because Bruno might get in trouble if he was to express this in front of the wrong person. - (65-6) What is Bruno's reaction to his new thoughts/feelings? Why do you think that he reacts this way?
Bruno's reaction to all of this new understanding of Maria is him feeling like he wants to cry. I think he reacts this way because he is empathetic towards her and feels sad about her story with her mother and Bruno's father. I think its all just a bit too much for a child to take in all at once when hes going through his tough time of the move.
Monday, August 22, 2011
Holocaust Poetry #2
Homeland
Lois E. Olena
It was Christmas eve and there was no room in the inn, the Oswiecim inn, so the Arrow Cross took the children, barefooted and in their nighties, out to the Danube and filled their little bellies not with bread but bullets flipping them like tiddlywinks into the congealing, icy river below. It was the Red Danube that night, choking on the blood of orphan Jews whose little Blue faces floated downstream touring even all of Europe until they washed up on the shores of Eretz Yisrael (Jewish homeland) and came back to life, their little blue and white bodies raised high, flapping in the wind.
- How is imagery used in this poem?
Imagery is used by describing there death, without actually saying it. The author uses descriptive words to tell us they're dead, e.g.and filled their little bellies not with bread but bullets.
- Discuss the effect of the simile in this poem.
The simile " flipping them like tiddlywinks" shows that the Nazi's "played" around with the Jews and just killed them like it was nothing.- How is alliteration used in the poem? What is the effect?
Alliteration is used with " bellies not with bread but bullets" and the effect is that it makes it more noticeable and stronger.- How does the author juxtapose the innocence of the children to the cruelty they experienced?
not sure..- What is meant by 'touring all of Europe'? It means that they floated in the rivers and not one picked them up or bothered and they went all around Germany, in a greater meaning i assume it means this happened everywhere in Germany and other places.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)